New year brings mass transit fare, service changes

Posted 12/29/10

The new year means it costs more to ride buses or light rail, and service changes become effective, which could lead to a longer wait time on some …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Username
Password
Log in

Don't have an ID?


Print subscribers

If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.

Non-subscribers

Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.

If you made a voluntary contribution in 2022-2023 of $50 or more, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access includes access to all websites and online content.


Our print publications are advertiser supported. For those wishing to access our content online, we have implemented a small charge so we may continue to provide our valued readers and community with unique, high quality local content. Thank you for supporting your local newspaper.

New year brings mass transit fare, service changes

Posted

The new year means it costs more to ride buses or light rail, and service changes become effective, which could lead to a longer wait time on some bus and light rail routes.

Citing the need to help address a predicted $12 million budget deficit next year, the Regional Transportation District Board of Directors raised all fares an average of 12 percent starting Jan. 1. The board also approved service changes effective Jan. 9 aimed at reducing operating costs.

The across-the-board fare hikes range between 11 percent and 14 percent and apply to cash fares as well as transit passes. For example, the local one-way cash fare increases from $2 to $2.25. The higher fares are expected to raise about $8 million during the year.

At the same time, the service cuts enacted are expected to reduce operating costs by about $2.4 million in 2011.

Soon after the board approved the two proposals in October, Director Kent Bagley, whose district includes Centennial and parts of Highlands Ranch, said the approvals were preceded by a lot of study and work by board members.

“No one was excited about raising fares. But that seemed like what was necessary in the light of the fact we have to eliminate the $12 million budget deficit we expect to face next year,” he said.

Bagley said the directors listened to comments from the public hearings and found that most people who attended said they would rather see higher fares than service cuts.

He said lengthy board discussions about service cuts resulted in agreement that it was better to reduce the frequency on some routes rather than eliminating any service completely.

Samuel Rosenberg said he spoke against the fare increases at the public hearings.

“I listened to their presentation but understanding why they raised the fares doesn’t make it any easier for me,” the Centennial man said as he waited for the train at the Littleton station. “Since I don’t drive, I have to depend on the bus and the train to get back and forth to work so I have little choice but to pay the increased costs even though I don’t like it one bit.”

Comments

Our Papers

Ad blocker detected

We have noticed you are using an ad blocking plugin in your browser.

The revenue we receive from our advertisers helps make this site possible. We request you whitelist our site.